People fighting for truth in the battle with lazy policing and that believe in the rights of innocent and peaceful cannabis consumers believe in the quality Kush friendly clothing offers. You know that arresting, verbalizing, put in custody, trying, releasing and the fines imposed on more than thirty thousand cannabis users annually involves a substantial number of police work. You know that this is effort that can easily be used in other places as they are needed elsewhere.
A detailed overview of these old discussions in Geneva was initially discussed. Later, it was realized that they do not matter. What matters is that the ban is maintained, and that people may assume that certain goals are achieved. The people fighting against this wrong make attempts to formulate what this ban targets.
It is not their ambition to answer the question of what dangers are wrongfully attributed. Cannabis supporters realize that these dangers are not recognized in Greece, Sweden, Holland and Belgium. Having the same hazards described in different ways depending on the country or political culture has led to a lot of change between 1936 and 2007.
You can ask European researchers across the pond to answer why cannabis is prohibited in their countries by the main bodies of their national enforcement systems. They will all reply, in very interesting ways, try it for yourself. The Swedish do it because cannabis is seen there as a stepping stone to other drugs, because it fosters apathy, and they have even accused the plant of causing schizophrenia. They believe that it can cause dependence, and various levels of psychosis.
Jehoiada Verrips is an anthropologist whose work has a fascination in the religious background of ritual murders in early 20th century in Europe. The murders and the need for them would be felt as a divine commandment, they cleared the perpetrators, liberated them from a defilement that was first transferred to the victims. According to Verrips, the victims here are people, but also plants!
There are similarities and differences between the responses various authorities will give you. The story about cannabis as a source of violence is only to be found in England and the USA. Of all the stories provided by the authorities, scientifically speaking, every one is either incorrect or highly questionable.
Cannabis as a stepping stone to other drugs, is the story you find everywhere, but it is really no longer even able to hold up to scrutiny, either. In one of the most elaborate calculations ever to be devoted, using two large random samples of the population of Amsterdam, scientists confirmed that drug use begins with tobacco, followed by alcohol.
There is no need to go into the debate about cannabis as a stepping stone drug. Just leave that statement as one that would lead to a series of epidemiological publications to tear it apart with proof about the unsustainability of cannabis as a stepping stone drug. The solution? Put your kit and show your colors for what's right!
A detailed overview of these old discussions in Geneva was initially discussed. Later, it was realized that they do not matter. What matters is that the ban is maintained, and that people may assume that certain goals are achieved. The people fighting against this wrong make attempts to formulate what this ban targets.
It is not their ambition to answer the question of what dangers are wrongfully attributed. Cannabis supporters realize that these dangers are not recognized in Greece, Sweden, Holland and Belgium. Having the same hazards described in different ways depending on the country or political culture has led to a lot of change between 1936 and 2007.
You can ask European researchers across the pond to answer why cannabis is prohibited in their countries by the main bodies of their national enforcement systems. They will all reply, in very interesting ways, try it for yourself. The Swedish do it because cannabis is seen there as a stepping stone to other drugs, because it fosters apathy, and they have even accused the plant of causing schizophrenia. They believe that it can cause dependence, and various levels of psychosis.
Jehoiada Verrips is an anthropologist whose work has a fascination in the religious background of ritual murders in early 20th century in Europe. The murders and the need for them would be felt as a divine commandment, they cleared the perpetrators, liberated them from a defilement that was first transferred to the victims. According to Verrips, the victims here are people, but also plants!
There are similarities and differences between the responses various authorities will give you. The story about cannabis as a source of violence is only to be found in England and the USA. Of all the stories provided by the authorities, scientifically speaking, every one is either incorrect or highly questionable.
Cannabis as a stepping stone to other drugs, is the story you find everywhere, but it is really no longer even able to hold up to scrutiny, either. In one of the most elaborate calculations ever to be devoted, using two large random samples of the population of Amsterdam, scientists confirmed that drug use begins with tobacco, followed by alcohol.
There is no need to go into the debate about cannabis as a stepping stone drug. Just leave that statement as one that would lead to a series of epidemiological publications to tear it apart with proof about the unsustainability of cannabis as a stepping stone drug. The solution? Put your kit and show your colors for what's right!
About the Author:
When you are looking for information on Kush friendly products, visit the web pages here today. You can see details at http://www.kushwear.net now.
No comments:
Post a Comment